When a PA workers’ compensation insurance carrier wants to “terminate” the workers’ comp benefits of an injured worker, the insurance company must prove that the injured worker has fully recovered from his or her work injury. What constitutes the “work injury” is usually what is described on the Notice of…
Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Lawyer Blog
Utilization Review in PA Workers’ Comp Pertains Only to Physician or Provider Named, Unless Providers Acting Under Same Physician
In PA Workers’ Compensation, when the workers’ comp insurance carrier feels the treatment rendered to an injured worker is no longer “reasonable” or “necessary,” the relief is for the insurance company to file for Utilization Review (UR). When a UR is requested, the PA Bureau of Workers’ Compensation randomly assigns…
Car Accident Victim Not Entitled to PA Workers’ Comp Benefits While Injured in Route to Patient’s Home
Generally speaking, employees in Pennsylvania are not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits when the employee is injured commuting to work (known as the “Coming and Going” rule). There are four notable exceptions to this rule. They are that the injured worker: (1) has an employment agreement which includes commuting to…
Workers Comp Judge in PA Can Select Highest Wage in Labor Market Survey
As discussed in previous blog entries, back in the old days (before the 1996 changes to the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act), if a workers’ comp insurance carrier wanted to cut a claimant’s worker’s compensation benefits, the carrier had to refer the person to an actual job lead. If the job…
“Severance” Package Under Collective Bargaining Agreement Does Not Trigger “Retirement” Burden of Proof Shift in PA Workers’ Comp
We have seen in recent decisions rendered by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania a trend toward punishing injured workers in PA who take any type of disability or retirement package, almost, seemingly, without regard for the reasons. In fact, earlier this month we posted a blog entry regarding Duferco Farrell…
New CRPS/RSD Treatment May Help Relieve Chronic Pain
Perhaps the most debilitating of conditions we see in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation cases are ones of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) [Formerly known as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD)]. The hallmark of this condition is severe and constant pain. Since there is no cure for CRPS/RSD, all doctors can do is…
In PA, Applying for Social Security Retirement Benefits Can Stop Workers’ Compensation Benefits
As discussed in previous blog entries, for several years now, the Courts in PA have caused decisions by Pennsylvania’s injured workers to have drastic consequences beyond what an injured worker could reasonably expect. Because of the decision in Pennsylvania State University v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Hensal), rendered by the…
PA Injured Worker’s Refusal to Enter Detox for Work-Related Prescription Drugs Leads to Suspension of Workers’ Compensation Benefits
This being a free Country, a workers’ compensation insurance company in PA cannot “force” an injured worker to get any medical treatment. However, the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act permits the suspension of workers’ comp benefits if an injured worker refuses “reasonable” medical treatment (Known as a “Forfeiture” Petition). Often in…
Notice of Ability to RTW Not Necessary in PA if Injured Worker Already Working
Under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, an insurance carrier cannot just stop, or even change, payments of workers’ comp benefits. Any change made by the workers’ compensation insurance carrier in PA, without permission of the injured worker, or a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), may be met with an assessment of…
Workers’ Compensation Settlement Tough Call in PA
From our blog, and our presence in the community, we receive many questions regarding workers’ compensation in Pennsylvania. Just recently, someone sent us an e-mail asking, “Is it a good idea to settle a case?” Like many aspects of law, there is no easy answer to this question. Settling a…