Close

Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Utilization Review in PA Workers’ Comp Can Cause Medication Dangers

On many occasions over the years, we have addressed the Utilization Review (UR) process in Pennsylvania workers’ compensation cases. This is the process either party, usually the workers’ comp insurance carrier, uses to obtain a determination as to whether a treatment at issue is “reasonable and necessary” such that the…

Updated:

Injured Workers in PA Can Sometimes Get Compensation for Pain and Suffering

While the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act generally precludes an injured worker in PA from suing his or her employer, the injured worker does have the ability to sue a third party, if that party is responsible for the injury. Since workers’ compensation in PA does not provide any payment for…

Updated:

Changing Description of Injury in PA Workers’ Comp Next Seminar For Glenn Neiman With Lawline.com

As noted in a previous blog posting, Glenn C. Neiman, a partner at Brilliant & Neiman LLC, joined the prestigious faculty of Lawline.com in 2008. It was recently announced that his next seminar for Lawline.com will be on changing the description of injury in PA workers’ compensation, a topic which…

Updated:

Medical Treatment in PA Workers’ Comp Not Reasonable or Necessary Because No Significant Improvement

Utilization Review is the proper course of action when either party in a PA workers’ compensation case questions whether medical treatment is reasonable and necessary. We have discussed this process in a previous blog entry. Since the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act is remedial legislation, intended by its creators to provide…

Updated:

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Accepts Appeal in Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Shoap)

Previously, we posted a blog entry on the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decision in Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Shoap). This was the decision where the Commonwealth Court was unmoved when the injured worker applied for every job in a Labor Market Survey and found none available to…

Updated:

Whether Injured Worker Voluntarily Left Labor Market, and Whether Injured Worker Subsequently Re-Entered Labor Market, Are Within Purview of PA Workers’ Compensation Judge

The issue of “retirement” and “voluntary withdrawal from the labor market” is one we see often in Pennsylvania workers’ compensation. We have had blog entries on how applying for Social Security Retirement benefits can impact the receipt of PA workers’ comp benefits, and how receipt of pension benefits can have…

Updated:

PA Supreme Court Accepts Appeal in Robinson

Back in October, we blogged about the decision of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in City of Pittsburgh v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Robinson), which addressed what caused a presumption that an injured worker “retired,” entitling the workers’ comp insurance carrier to a suspension of workers’ compensation benefits. The decision…

Updated:

Suspension of PA Workers’ Comp Benefits Denied When Injured Worker Unable to Perform Police Job, Regardless of Loss of Certification

Under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, PA workers’ comp benefits can be suspended by a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) when an injured worker’s loss of earnings is no longer due to the work injury, but is instead due to reasons other than the work injury. This issue was recently handed…

Updated:

PA Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Issues New Notice of Compensation Denial; Employers No Longer Able to Accept Claims by Using Denial

Readers of this blog, from previous blog entries, know our frustration with the developing practice of workers’ comp insurance carriers “accepting” medical-only claims by issuing a Notice of Denial (NCD). Aside from the logical problem, there are procedural issues this creates for attorneys representing injured workers in PA. For example,…

Contact Us