Close

Articles Posted in Case Law Update

Updated:

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to Determine Whether Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Applied Firefighter Presumption Correctly

Back in August, 2016, we discussed the case of City of Philadelphia Fire Department v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Sladek).  For those who do not recall, this was the case (well, one of several recent cases actually) which determined that a firefighter must prove the cancer he or she developed…

Updated:

Worker Injured While Remodeling a Restaurant Not “Employee,” Not in “Construction Business”

A threshold issue in a Pennsylvania workers’ compensation case is whether the person who was injured was actually an “employee.”  This is an area we have addressed on this blog in the past.  Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decided a case regarding this issue. In the matter of Department…

Updated:

Employee Injured Going to Work Covered by PA Workers’ Comp, Was “On Call”

We have previously discussed the “coming and going rule” in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation, where, essentially, an employee is not covered by the PA Workers’ Compensation Act if he or she is injured while on the commute to or from work.  Like most legal rules, of course, there are exceptions.  The…

Updated:

IRE Must Contain All Impairment Related to Work Injury in PA

Back in June, 2015, we discussed the Commonwealth Court decision in Duffey v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Trola-Dyne, Inc.).  In this decision, which confounded us at the time, the Court said that an injured worker could not successfully expand the description of his or her work injury after an Impairment…

Updated:

Employee Injured in Pennsylvania Apparently Has No Right to Have Benefit of PA Law

As we have mentioned, workers’ compensation laws vary widely from State to State, making the selection of which workers’ compensation laws apply to a given case a critical determination.  As much as there are things in PA law that benefit the workers’ comp insurance carrier, many aspects of Pennsylvania law…

Updated:

PA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Carrier Entitled to Credit for Future Medical Treatment After Personal Injury Case

As noted on our website, generally, an injured worker cannot sue his or her employer for its negligence in causing a work-related injury.  Additionally, unlike in a negligence case, workers’ compensation benefits do not include payment for pain and suffering.  Occasionally, however, there is another party (a “third party”) that…

Updated:

No Real “Change” Needed to Show Termination; Penalty of Zero Correct for Unlawful Refusal to Pay for Surgery

When the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Lewis v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board  back in 2007, we attorneys who represent the injured worker thought things had really changed.  No longer could the workers’ comp insurance carrier file Termination Petition after Termination Petition in an endless series to evade the payment…

Contact Us