Close

Articles Posted in Case Law Update

Updated:

Utilization Review in PA Workers’ Comp Pertains Only to Physician or Provider Named, Unless Providers Acting Under Same Physician

In PA Workers’ Compensation, when the workers’ comp insurance carrier feels the treatment rendered to an injured worker is no longer “reasonable” or “necessary,” the relief is for the insurance company to file for Utilization Review (UR). When a UR is requested, the PA Bureau of Workers’ Compensation randomly assigns…

Updated:

Car Accident Victim Not Entitled to PA Workers’ Comp Benefits While Injured in Route to Patient’s Home

Generally speaking, employees in Pennsylvania are not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits when the employee is injured commuting to work (known as the “Coming and Going” rule). There are four notable exceptions to this rule. They are that the injured worker: (1) has an employment agreement which includes commuting to…

Updated:

Workers Comp Judge in PA Can Select Highest Wage in Labor Market Survey

As discussed in previous blog entries, back in the old days (before the 1996 changes to the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act), if a workers’ comp insurance carrier wanted to cut a claimant’s worker’s compensation benefits, the carrier had to refer the person to an actual job lead. If the job…

Updated:

“Severance” Package Under Collective Bargaining Agreement Does Not Trigger “Retirement” Burden of Proof Shift in PA Workers’ Comp

We have seen in recent decisions rendered by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania a trend toward punishing injured workers in PA who take any type of disability or retirement package, almost, seemingly, without regard for the reasons. In fact, earlier this month we posted a blog entry regarding Duferco Farrell…

Updated:

In PA, Applying for Social Security Retirement Benefits Can Stop Workers’ Compensation Benefits

As discussed in previous blog entries, for several years now, the Courts in PA have caused decisions by Pennsylvania’s injured workers to have drastic consequences beyond what an injured worker could reasonably expect. Because of the decision in Pennsylvania State University v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Hensal), rendered by the…

Updated:

PA Injured Worker’s Refusal to Enter Detox for Work-Related Prescription Drugs Leads to Suspension of Workers’ Compensation Benefits

This being a free Country, a workers’ compensation insurance company in PA cannot “force” an injured worker to get any medical treatment. However, the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act permits the suspension of workers’ comp benefits if an injured worker refuses “reasonable” medical treatment (Known as a “Forfeiture” Petition). Often in…

Updated:

Notice of Ability to RTW Not Necessary in PA if Injured Worker Already Working

Under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, an insurance carrier cannot just stop, or even change, payments of workers’ comp benefits. Any change made by the workers’ compensation insurance carrier in PA, without permission of the injured worker, or a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), may be met with an assessment of…

Updated:

Medical Benefits Can Be Suspended Under PA Workers’ Compensation Act

The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act allows a workers’ comp insurance carrier to obtain an “Independent Medical Examination” (IME) [Which, of course, is usually anything but “Independent”] at “reasonable” intervals. If an injured worker refuses to attend an ordered IME, a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) can suspend the injured worker’s benefits…

Contact Us